Trade for your account.
MAM | PAMM | POA.
Forex prop firm | Asset management company | Personal large funds.
Formal starting from $500,000, test starting from $50,000.
Profits are shared by half (50%), and losses are shared by a quarter (25%).
*No teaching *No selling courses *No discussion *If yes, no reply!
Forex multi-account manager Z-X-N
Accepts global forex account operation, investment, and trading
Assists family office investment and autonomous management
In forex trading, if traders want to treat their trading as a career, they must learn to ignore trivial matters.
Traders' energy and focus are limited resources. Frequently distracting themselves with trivial matters not only wastes precious energy but also leads to failure in truly important pursuits. Even if a trader is principled, these principles should guide their trading career, not be used to measure the trivialities of life. Overly applying principles to trivial matters can lead to distractions and loss of focus on their core business of trading.
In forex trading, traders must learn to ignore trivial matters, focus on the bigger picture, and adhere to their principles in these matters. This ability is the key to success, not allowing trivial matters to distract them and prevent them from achieving what truly matters.
In the two-way trading world of forex investment, there's a widespread phenomenon that profoundly impacts a trader's success or failure: poor execution and a lack of initiative, fundamentally rooted in human nature.
This common flaw isn't limited to a small number of traders; it's widespread among the majority of market participants. Even if traders have mastered comprehensive trading theory, established a sophisticated trading system, and even accurately predicted market trends, they often struggle to strictly adhere to established strategies and hesitate to implement operational decisions. Ultimately, this inability to convert theoretical advantages into actual profits is a core obstacle for many traders in breaking through their profit bottleneck.
In the two-way trading of forex investment, this common human flaw has also given rise to a thought-provoking paradox: many forex traders considered "extremely intelligent," with their exceptional learning abilities and quick market reactions, can easily understand complex trading logic and master a wide range of analytical tools, yet remain unable to achieve the financial freedom of their investment and trading lives. Conversely, many forex traders with average skills, seemingly inferior in learning speed and logical analysis, are able to steadily accumulate wealth through long-term trading, ultimately achieving their goal of financial freedom.
The root of this discrepancy lies precisely in the difference between "execution" and "action," as well as the different approaches these two types of traders take to the core trading principle of "simple repetition." Forex traders with average skills often clearly recognize their own limitations and avoid pursuing complex strategic innovations or shortcuts. Instead, they choose to repeatedly practice proven, simple trading logic (such as fixed entry and exit criteria and clear risk control rules), bringing these repetitive, simple tasks to perfection. In their view, the key to profitable trading lies not in the sophistication of their strategies, but in the ability to consistently and steadily execute effective strategies. Even when the process lacks novelty or even involves monotonous repetitive operations, they persevere through strong execution, constantly strengthening their operational proficiency and optimizing their judgment of details through day-to-day practice, ultimately establishing a stable profit model.
Highly intelligent forex traders, however, are quite different. Due to their inherent strengths, they often disdain the "simple, repetitive" approach, believing that mastering simple, repetitive tasks to perfection is an inefficient method reserved for "dumb" individuals. Instead, they pursue complex strategy combinations and frequent method innovation, seeking a "perfect" shortcut to profitability. More importantly, they find it difficult to tolerate the tedium and boredom of "simple, repetitive" work. This type of work lacks intellectual challenge and fails to satisfy their desire for novelty and a sense of accomplishment. Consequently, even if they develop an effective strategy in the short term, they struggle to stick with it long-term. They often abandon or switch strategies before they see results, ultimately falling into a cycle of "learning more, doing less, and earning less," preventing them from achieving stable profits.
This disparity in outcomes, caused by differing execution abilities and attitudes toward "simple repetition," is also common in real life. For example, in the business world, many mediocre individuals ultimately become business owners, while many exceptionally intelligent individuals wind up working for these mediocre individuals. The underlying logic is highly similar to that found in the foreign exchange market: mediocre entrepreneurs are often more willing to set aside their perceived dignity, clearly recognizing that "getting business and receiving orders" is the core of their business's survival. Even when faced with indifference, sarcasm, or even the cold shoulder during door-to-door sales, they remain completely oblivious to their humiliation. With unwavering determination, they repeatedly visit clients, communicate their needs, and through countless attempts, accumulate orders and expand their market, ultimately growing their businesses. Meanwhile, exceptionally intelligent individuals often have strong self-esteem. When faced with setbacks in sales, they often give up due to the psychological loss of their dignity after repeated rejections or cold receptions. Unwilling to endure the pressure of "damaged dignity," they ultimately choose relatively stable jobs, relying on their intelligence for a steady income, making it difficult for them to achieve financial breakthroughs. Anyone who has started a company or factory has a deep understanding of the process of "putting dignity aside to focus on business."
Back to the two-way trading of forex investment, this real-world example further demonstrates that, whether in trading or entrepreneurship, "talent" isn't the sole factor determining success or failure, nor even the core factor. "Execution," "action," and a commitment to "simple repetition" are the keys to overcoming difficulties and achieving goals. A brilliant mind can help traders understand the market more quickly, but without execution, even the most sophisticated strategies remain mere theoretical talk. Average talent may lengthen the learning process, but as long as one persists in applying simple, effective methods to the highest standards, they can still find their own path to profitability in the market. Therefore, for forex traders, overcoming the common human flaws of "poor execution and lack of action" and embracing the value of "simple repetition" are far more important than pursuing a sense of superiority in talent. This is not only the essential path to profitable trading, but also the core logic for achieving financial freedom.
In the two-way trading landscape of forex investment, "greed" is often given a negative connotation. However, from the perspective of the nature of trading and human nature, traders need to properly manage this "greed" rather than completely deny it.
In fact, among forex traders, few are completely free of greed. The desire for profit and the pursuit of higher returns are deeply ingrained in their trading behavior, forming a crucial psychological foundation that drives traders to continuously participate in the market.
Further consideration reveals that in two-way forex trading, if traders lack greed and a desire for higher profits, their core motivation for participating is missing. After all, the trading market is fraught with uncertainty, requiring one to bear the risks of price fluctuations and invest considerable time and energy in market research and strategy refinement. If one is content with meager returns, one can easily choose a more stable lifestyle, such as working for a company with a fixed salary or factory income, without the uncertainty of the trading market. From this perspective, greed itself is not a bad thing. It is not only a key driver of human progress in social development, but also the inherent motivation for traders to actively seek profits and continuously break through in the forex market. It is precisely this desire for profit that drives traders to delve into professional knowledge, study market trends, optimize trading strategies, and continuously improve their trading skills through practice.
However, in actual forex trading, many traders, when faced with failure or losses, often simply blame greed. The phrase "I was too greedy" seems to be the perfect excuse to cover up any problems. Unfortunately, this attribution is often far from the truth behind the trading losses. In forex trading, the true cause of losses ultimately boils down to one single factor: the trader's own ignorance, incompetence, and unwiseness. "Ignorance" manifests as a lack of a systematic and in-depth understanding of key knowledge, such as market dynamics, core trading theories, and risk control logic, resulting in a superficial understanding of trading. "Incompetence" refers to an inability to translate theoretical knowledge into practical trading skills. Faced with complex and volatile market conditions, it is difficult to accurately judge trends, grasp entry and exit timing, and effectively respond to sudden market fluctuations. "Unwiseness" manifests as a lack of clear understanding of one's own trading capabilities. After a loss, one is unable to objectively analyze the root cause, instead falling into the trap of emotional decision-making or blindly following the crowd.
Those traders who claim to be "too greedy," "careless," or "bad luck," or who shift the blame to "bad trading rules," "flawed management systems," or "bad mentality," are essentially evading their own problems. Especially for those who still blame external factors, insisting that their losses stem from greed, a poor mentality, bad luck, or flawed trading rules and management systems, they are often still at the early stages of trading understanding and are destined to be "outsiders" in forex trading. From a long-term trading perspective, continued losses are likely to become their inescapable fate. The underlying logic is quite simple: if a trader cannot even correctly understand their true ability level, or even refuses to face the reality of their own shortcomings and incompetence, then they lack the premise for self-improvement, let alone actively exploring and finding methods that truly lead to stable profits in the market.
In two-way forex trading, for each market trend, traders need to clearly quantify the potential profit potential, the strength of the market movement, and the duration of the trend in advance. These key dimensions require precise quantification through the establishment of clear mathematical criteria. For example, by analyzing historical market data to set reasonable profit targets, using technical indicators (such as trading volume and MACD histogram) to judge the strength of the market movement, and combining timeframes (such as daily and hourly charts) to assess the sustainability of the trend. If a trader is unable to achieve this, unable to discern subtle market fluctuations and grasp the core characteristics of the market through quantitative criteria, then this essentially reflects a lack of trading ability.
Lacking this ability to conduct quantitative analysis and judgment, traders often fall prey to instinctive, subjective "profit fantasies" when faced with market conditions, unconsciously hoping to "make a killing this time," basing their profit expectations on unfounded subjective assumptions. Occasionally, the market does exhibit smooth, sustained, and powerful trends, and this "greed" may lead to significant gains. However, the vast majority of the time, the forex market lacks these desirable characteristics, instead exhibiting frequent fluctuations, weak trend sustainability, and limited momentum. If traders cling to their "big-money" ambitions in these conditions and are unwilling to promptly take profits, profits can easily turn into losses. Even more serious is that after profits turn into losses, if traders remain obsessed with the idea of a "big rally coming soon" and cling to losing positions, their initially small losses can gradually escalate into larger ones, and even face the risk of a liquidated account in extreme market conditions.
At this point, forex traders truly need to realize that the root cause of trading losses isn't greed, but rather a lack of clear and actionable criteria for judging key factors like market strength and sustainability. This inability to accurately identify whether a market is nearing its end or a trend reversal is imminent. This is the core cause of losses. Once traders truly understand this, they will no longer dwell on superficial issues like "whether to curb greed" and instead focus on improving their trading skills. Through systematic study and practice, they will establish clear and unambiguous judgment criteria, learn how to accurately identify market end signals and trend reversal points, and shift their understanding of the market from subjective assumptions to objective and quantitative analysis.
Once traders have developed the ability to judge market trends based on quantitative criteria, the question of whether to be greedy or not will naturally be resolved. In actual trading, if the market continues to advance and there are no signs of a trend ending or reversal, traders can hold their positions firmly and enjoy the profits brought by the trend with "reasonable greed," easily realizing asset appreciation. If the market shows clear signs of weakening and enters a short-term correction, they can promptly close their positions and lock in profits to avoid profit-taking. If the market is range-bound and no clear trend has emerged, they can adopt a swing trading strategy, capturing small price fluctuations repeatedly to gradually accumulate profits.
At this point, traders have a clear understanding of the potential and risks of each market wave, are confident and confident, and naturally no longer worry about whether to be greedy. Specifically, when the market is showing strong and sustained momentum, with no signs of exiting, traders should be proactively greedy, holding onto their positions to maximize the high profits brought by the trend. When the market is weak and lacks sustainability, lacking the potential for large profits, traders should exercise rational restraint, exiting promptly after making small profits and accumulating multiple small profits to achieve overall profit growth. This "greedy" approach, dynamically adjusted based on market conditions, is the most rational and efficient profit-making strategy in forex trading.
In the two-way trading landscape of forex investment, a noteworthy phenomenon is that truly successful traders have long shared their proven trading strategies, operating methods, and understanding of market dynamics through various public channels. These core "successful experiences" are not deliberately hidden, but instead are presented online in various forms such as articles, videos, and forum posts, making them freely available to any investor.
But the reality is, most investors who acquire this knowledge for free neither take it seriously nor commit to transforming it into actual trading skills. Many simply skim through it, save it to their favorites, and then disregard it. Even those who do attempt to apply it to market practice often give up easily due to a lack of immediate results. Ultimately, it's precisely this very "free" nature that causes most people to overlook the practical value of this knowledge, falling into the misconception that "easy acquisition leads to indifference."
Further observation reveals that in the forex investment sector, the percentage of investors who learn trading knowledge through free channels who ultimately master core skills and achieve stable profits is extremely low, almost nonexistent. The core reason behind this is closely related to the psychological expectations fostered by "free" trading: when knowledge or skills are acquired without cost, learners often lack sufficient awe and commitment. They neither invest significant time in deeply delving into the underlying logic nor repeatedly review and adjust their strategies when faced with losses. Instead, they are more likely to attribute failures to "useless knowledge" rather than a lack of understanding or thorough implementation. More crucially, the core competency required for forex trading isn't simply a "knowledge base," but rather the ability to translate theory into practical decision-making. Many investors mistakenly believe that simply hearing about a strategy or understanding an analytical method equates to mastering trading skills. This ignores the fundamental difference between "knowledge" and "ability": the former is the passive reception of information, while the latter is the active decision-making instinct developed through extensive deliberate practice. The transformation from knowledge to ability requires repeated market validation, tedious replay training, and the ability to persevere in executing strategies despite repeated losses. This process is often accompanied by hardship and frustration, forming a stark contrast to the perceived ease of access offered by "free learning."
In fact, within the publicly available forex investment information system, there are numerous resources that clearly explain the core logic behind both the philosophical aspects of trading (such as understanding risk and establishing trading discipline) and the practical aspects of trading (such as applying technical indicators and determining entry and exit points). The market is never short of high-quality free learning resources. The crux of the matter, however, lies in whether investors possess the wisdom to discern authenticity and identify core value. The same trading strategy may be interpreted differently by different sharers. Some, in an effort to attract traffic, deliberately exaggerate the strategy's profitability, concealing its applicable market environment and risk profile. Truly valuable content often requires repeated verification by investors, drawing on their own trading experience and market knowledge, to separate the true from the false. This means that even when presented with free, high-quality information, only investors with a degree of market insight and independent thinking can extract the valuable insights. For most novices, who lack basic understanding, free information can become "information noise," potentially leading to trading losses due to misinterpretation of strategies. This is precisely why the saying "free is always the most expensive" spreads within the industry. While free knowledge may seem free, misjudging its value and leading to investment errors often results in losses far exceeding the cost of paid learning. The fact that it's not valued further amplifies this risk. This is essentially a reflection of the human instinct to "seek the easy way out" and "emphasize short-term costs over long-term value." This instinct is deeply ingrained in most people's cognitive patterns and is difficult to completely change through simple guidance. After all, the preference for "low-cost acquisition" and the aversion to "hard work" are psychological traits shaped by long-term human evolution.
Even more contrastingly, when many forex novice investors choose to pay for training, the content they encounter is essentially the same as the free knowledge publicly available in the market. Whether it's the logic of core strategies, technical analysis methods, or risk management principles, the core information conveyed in paid courses can often be found in equivalent versions in free channels. Yet, paid learning is significantly more effective than free learning. The key lies in the fact that the act of paying alters learners' mental state and behavioral logic: When investors pay for knowledge, they naturally experience a "sunk cost effect," believing that if they don't study diligently and practice diligently, they'll feel like they've paid for it. Driven by this mentality, they'll be more proactive in delving into the course content, refining strategic details, and even actively seeking out market cases for simulation training after class. Furthermore, paid learning often comes with certain oversight mechanisms (such as instructor Q&A sessions and peer discussion groups). This external constraint further strengthens learners' execution, encouraging them to overcome psychological barriers to "boring training" and "difficult practice" and truly commit to the process of transforming knowledge into competence. In contrast, free knowledge, lacking these "cost constraints" and "psychological motivation," is more likely to lead learners to fall into the self-deprecating "learning means mastery." They're unwilling to endure the pain of deliberate practice and unable to persevere through failures, ultimately leading to the "useless" outcome of their learning. The root cause of this isn't a difference in the value of the knowledge itself, but rather the inherent human principle that "effort is proportional to appreciation."
In forex trading, there are no traders with a 100% win rate. Claims of achieving such a win rate are clearly unrealistic.
Unless someone permanently exits the market after making a profit, maintaining a 100% win rate in consistent trading is virtually impossible. This phenomenon is common in the forex market, as the market is rife with uncertainty, and no trading strategy can guarantee permanent success. Even world-renowned forex fund managers, regardless of their trading strategy, cannot achieve a 100% win rate. This is not due to a lack of ability, but rather due to the complexity and uncertainty of the forex market, which makes any trading strategy unreliable.
Not only does a 100% win rate not exist in forex trading, but claims of a steep equity curve are also worthy of suspicion. A steep equity curve typically indicates large profits achieved in a short period of time, a phenomenon that is extremely rare in real trading. On the contrary, it's more likely a sign of a scam. A healthy and sustainable equity curve should be relatively stable, not experiencing sharp rises or falls. Those claiming to have a steep equity curve are often trying to attract investors' attention and commit fraud. Therefore, investors should remain vigilant when faced with such claims and avoid taking unnecessary risks.
Furthermore, those claiming a 100% win rate are often trying to collect tuition or promote a product. This claim is unfounded in real trading. In the futures market, even the most widely recognized top traders cannot achieve a 100% win rate. Therefore, when someone claims they have a 100% win rate, don't hesitate; they're likely trying to get you to pay fees or purchase their services. Investors should understand that forex investing is a complex and challenging field, and no one can guarantee permanent profits. True success comes from consistent long-term performance, not exaggerated short-term claims.
13711580480@139.com
+86 137 1158 0480
+86 137 1158 0480
+86 137 1158 0480
z.x.n@139.com
Mr. Z-X-N
China · Guangzhou